Legal Opinion

Vœgtly v. School Directors of the Third Ward

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1845PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error. Writ of error to the District Court of Alleghany county, where judgment was entered in favour of the School Directors of the Third Ward of the city of Alleghany, against the defendant below and plaintiff in error, Nicholas Voegtly, upon an amicable action of debt and case stated, with a right to take out a writ of error.

Read the full summary

In Error. Writ of error to the District Court of Alleghany county, where judgment was entered in favour of the School Directors of the Third Ward of the city of Alleghany, against the defendant below and plaintiff in error, Nicholas Voegtly, upon an amicable action of debt and case stated, with a right to take out a writ of error. The facts necessary to elucidate the opinion of the court, it is believed, are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court below, which is as follows:— “The defendant, Nicholas Vcegtly, sold a tract of land to Warner & Painter, on the 21st July, 1835, by article…

1Per curiam

We entirely concur with the judge who ruled the cause below, and confirm the judgment, for the reasons he has given for his opinion.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. Vicksburg Hospital, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Galbreath v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
  3. McKelvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1984
  5. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API