Cuervo v. Opera Solutions LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The court properly dismissed plaintiffs first cause of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 191 and 193. While plaintiff was entitled to be paid commissions pursuant to the offer letter, *427the letter expressly reserved to Opera Solutions the right to modify the commission structure at any time. Accordingly, the reduction of plaintiff’s commissions did not violate the letter contract or Labor Law §§ 191 and 193 (see Pachter v Bernard Hodes Group, Inc., 10 NY3d 609, 618 [2008]; see also Arbeeny v Kennedy Exec. Search, Inc., 71 AD3d 177, 180 [2010]).
Neither plaintiffs factual allegations nor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pachter v. BERNARD HODESNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Arbeeny v. Kennedy Executive Search, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Wing Wong v. King Sun YeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perella Weinberg Partners LLC v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Orgill v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Orgill v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Wender v. GA Global Markets, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017