Dennison v. Gault
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. — Hon. David E. Blair, Judge. The court erred in oyerruling defendant’s instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence and in giving plaintiff’s instructions Nos. 1, 2, 3, and each of them, and in refusing defendant’s instructions 7, 8, 10, and each of them. Chapman y. Currie, 51 Mo. 43; Carr v. Ubsell, 97 Mo. App. 331; Morrison y. Murphy, 36 Mo. App. 36; Bent v. Priest, 86 Mo. 482; Norman y. Rose-man, 59 M'o. App. 685; Dennison y.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. — Hon. David E. Blair, Judge. The court erred in oyerruling defendant’s instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence and in giving plaintiff’s instructions Nos. 1, 2, 3, and each of them, and in refusing defendant’s instructions 7, 8, 10, and each of them. Chapman y. Currie, 51 Mo. 43; Carr v. Ubsell, 97 Mo. App. 331; Morrison y. Murphy, 36 Mo. App. 36; Bent v. Priest, 86 Mo. 482; Norman y. Rose-man, 59 M'o. App. 685; Dennison y. Gault, 132 Mo. App. 301. It is true that a real estate broker can not recover commission from both parties to the sale,…
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
In this action plaintiff seeks to recover for expenses of a trip to the East, made, as he claims, under a contract with defendant and others, by which they had agreed to pay his expenses if he should go East and undertake to secure purchasers for certain *445property wbicb was in tbeir bands for sale as real estate agents. Judgment was for plaintiff and defendant has appealed. This is the second verdict for plaintiff and the second appeal. The first is reported in 132 Mo. App. 301, 111 S. W. 844. On that appeal the judgment of the lower court was reversed and the cause remanded because the trial…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dennison v. GaultMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldsberry v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914