Legal Opinion

Biard v. Laumann

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1911No. 992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Murray County Court; Harry W. Fielding, Judge. Action by T. B. Laumann against J. W. Biard and J. PI. Biard. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the county court of Murray county, and was an action by defendant in error as plaintiff against plaintiffs in error as defendants to recover rent on two certain tracts of land. Plaintiff bottomed his action upon a certain written lease under which defendants took possession of the property consisting of two tracts of land, one of 60 acres and the other alleged to be of 30 acres. The contract ran for four years, and provided that the plaintiff should furnish fruit trees and pay defendants at the expiration of the lease for planting and preserving the same at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMaster v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Wade v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stone v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Dunn v. Modern Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. IsenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Ford v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API