Legal Opinion
Isely v. Isely
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 9, 1985No. 85-247PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
Stephen Isely filed a Petition for Writ of Prohibition challenging the jurisdiction of the Pope Chancery Court to hear a divorce suit brought against him by the respondent, Susan Isely. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 29(l)(f).
The Isleys were married in April, 1978 and lived in Morrilton, Conway County, Arkansas, until April, 1985. When they separated on April 15, 1985, Mrs. Isely returned to her parent’s home in Pope County and Mr. Isely remained in Morrilton. Mrs. Isely filed for divorce on April 17,1985 in Pope Chancery Court. Mr. Isely filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Twin City Lines, Inc. v. Cummings, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Miller v. LoftonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Murry v. ManerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Statewide Health Coordinating Council v. Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nucor-Yamato Steel Co. v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR OSCEOLA DIST. OF MISSISSIPPI CTY.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Nucor-Yamato Steel Co. v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR OSCEOLA DIST. OF MISSISSIPPI CTY.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994