Legal Opinion
Keefe v. Gora
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 10, 1944No. Civil Action No. 733Published
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, District Judge.
This action under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, has been brought as a result of two interferences between the parties hereto in the Patent Office, viz., No. 76,583 and No. 76,584, each comprising three claims. The Patent Office awarded priority to Gora, one of the defendants herein and assignor to the co-defendant Jenkins Brothers, and on Gora’s application, Serial No. 134,863, filed April 3, 1937, patent No. 2,293,132 was issued on August 18, 1942, including all the claims in interference.
The subject matter of the controversy lies in the field of air valves — such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Sherman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941