Crawford v. Riddle

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Dietzman

Reversing.

In January, 1927, the appellant, E. L. Crawford, brought suit against Estill Biddle, Dave Biddle, Della Biddle, and Julia Biddle, on a claim he had against Estill Biddle for $750, interest and cost, arising out of his payment as surety for Estill Biddle of an obligation of the latter to the Hargis Commercial Bank & Trust Company. His claim against Estill Biddle was for reimbursement and against Julia Biddle because of an alleged assumption by her in the transfer to her of certain realty by Estill Biddle, her son, of this obligation of…