In re the Estate of Timko
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The reasonably active imagination of the court is unable to conceive of a more bizarre, not to say fantastic, record than that which was evolved in this case after an exceptionally acrimonious trial occupying three full court days. The parties initiated their excursion into the realms of the unusual by a waiver of the provisions of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act, which inhibits the introduction of the testimony of interested parties in relation to personal transactions with the decedent, and with this inauspicious beginning, launched into a welter of wholly incompetent and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Mabie v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- In Re the Estate of PoriandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re the Estate of CallahanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of WeinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of CurranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934