Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Timko

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 13, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The reasonably active imagination of the court is unable to conceive of a more bizarre, not to say fantastic, record than that which was evolved in this case after an exceptionally acrimonious trial occupying three full court days. The parties initiated their excursion into the realms of the unusual by a waiver of the provisions of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act, which inhibits the introduction of the testimony of interested parties in relation to personal transactions with the decedent, and with this inauspicious beginning, launched into a welter of wholly incompetent and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Mabie v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. In Re the Estate of PoriandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. In re the Estate of CallahanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WeinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of CurranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API