Legal Opinion

Wise v. Fuller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

This is an ordinary foreclosure suit. The point chiefly contested on the hearing was whether the complainant was entitled to a decree for deficiency against the defendant, Levi A. Fuller. His liability grows out of a covenant contained in a deed made to him for the mortgaged premises by Daniel Fuller. No question was raised as to the sufficiency of his covenant, nor was it disputed that he accepted the deed with full knowledge of its presence. He says there was no previous agreement that he should assume the payment of the mortgage, but he admits he read the covenant when…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sandford v. HandyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. King v. WhitelyNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Trotter v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Smith v. . CountrymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Taylor v. FleetNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Iback v. Elevator Supplies Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  2. Usbe Bldg. v. Ocean Pier RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Trautwein v. BozzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Berger v. Harrison Improvement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  5. St. John the Baptist, C., Church v. GengorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API