Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 14, 2009No. 0230084PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALEY, Judge.

Within Article 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code, “Criminal Sexual Assault,” Code § 18.2-67.10(3) defines “Mental Incapacity” as “that condition ... existing at the time of an offense ... which prevents the complaining witness from understanding the nature or consequences of the sexual act involved----” Charles M. Sanford was convicted by the trial court of forcible sodomy (cunnilingus), accomplished through the use of the victim’s mental incapacity, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.1(A)(2). Sanford does not argue that the evidence is insufficient to establish the act of sodomy. Rather,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  3. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  4. Haskins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  5. Maxwell v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  2. Catherine Ann Tomlin, a/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2022
  3. James Paul Desper v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API