Legal Opinion

Cate v. Dover Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 15, 1989No. 9707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

Edward Cate appeals an unfavorable summary judgment in his suit against the Dover Corporation alleging breach of the implied warranty of merchantability in a sale of vehicle lifts. The issue before us is whether the trial court erred in granting Dover’s motion for summary judgment because a disclaimer contained in Dover’s warranty was not conspicuous as required by Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 2.316 (Vernon 1968 & Supp.1989). We determine that the disclaimer is conspicuous.

In September 1984, Cate bought three Rotary brand vehicle lifts from Beech Tire Mart. Dover Corporation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Roskey v. Texas Health Facilities CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Griffin v. RowdenTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rodney Clark v. Delaval Separator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Singleton v. LaCoureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cate v. Dover Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cate v. Dover Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Cate v. Dover Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API