Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Warnock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 26, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Petition for specific performance, etc. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. March term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Warnock entered into a written contract with Lindsay, in which it was stipulated that if Lindsay should find on certain land of Warnock between January 7, 1891, and August 27, 1891, any minerals that would justify the “ employ of labor,” Warnock would convey to Lindsay a half-interest in all the minerals that Lindsay might find, open and develop “ to the extent that it will justify the employ of labor,” with timber and water for mining purposes; it being also stipulated therein *620that Lindsay should prospect the land at his own expense, and should not stop work over thirty days…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peacock v. DeweeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Morrow v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Brown v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Peeples v. Citizens National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Burnell v. BradburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API