Legal Opinion

Bernardo Penoro v. Rederi A/b Disa and Vessel Disa, Her Motors, Engines, Boilers, Gear Andtackles, Rederi A/b Disa, and Third-Party v. Cunard Steamship Company, Ltd., Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 3, 1967No. 30911Published

1Opinion of the Court

376 F.2d 125

Bernardo PENORO, Plaintiff,

v.

REDERI A/B DISA and VESSEL DISA, her motors, engines,

boilers, gear andtackles, defendants.

REDERI A/B DISA, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CUNARD STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Ltd., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 345, Docket 30911.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 24, 1967.

Decided April 3, 1967.

William P. Kain, Jr., New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens and Thomas F. Molanphy, New York City, on the brief), for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

John W. Castles, 3d, New York City (Lord, Day & Lord,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API