Legal Opinion

Williams v. Romarm S.A.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 14, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-0183Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 19-cv-183 (EGS) ROMARM S.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction On April 1, 2020, the Court granted Defendant Romarm S.A.’s (“Romarm”) Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 9; Plaintiffs J.H. (through his legal representatives Norman Williams and Diane Howe), Kevin Attaway, and Jamel Blakeley’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) action against Romarm under the District of Columbia’s Assault Weapons Manufacturing Strict Liability Statute (“SLA”),

D.C. Code § 7-2551

et seq., for damages stemming from two…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API