Williams v. Romarm S.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 19-cv-183 (EGS) ROMARM S.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction On April 1, 2020, the Court granted Defendant Romarm S.A.’s (“Romarm”) Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 9; Plaintiffs J.H. (through his legal representatives Norman Williams and Diane Howe), Kevin Attaway, and Jamel Blakeley’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) action against Romarm under the District of Columbia’s Assault Weapons Manufacturing Strict Liability Statute (“SLA”),
D.C. Code § 7-2551
et seq., for damages stemming from two…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.