Legal Opinion

Gates v. Reese

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 30, 1932No. 4-2572PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

Appellant proceeded under § 69 of act 65 of the Acts of 1929 to collect from appellee the privilege tax provided for in acts Nos. 62 and 65 of the Acts of 1929 for operating a motor vehicle for compensation for the transportation of persons, property, or freight.

Appellee brought this suit in the chancery court to enjoin appellant from proceeding further in the collection of said privilege tax upon the alleged grounds: first, that said tax is confiscatory in that it is greater than the earnings of the business; and, second, because their particular business did not constitute an operation of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Fitzgerald v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrington v. GillumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API