Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Lichtenstein
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided August 12, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
A surviving trustee of deceased here accounts for her own actions as such trustee and, as one of the executrices of Julius B. Lane, accounts for his actions as cotrustee while he lived. By the petition the accounting trustee asks the court to determine whether Elinor Lane Asch, a daughter of her deceased cotrustee, was and is entitled to have paid to her out of the trust fund a sum of $25,000. In addition the petition asks that if such daughter is declared entitled to the fund the court determine whether it is payable out of the general principal of the trust fund created by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In Re the Estate of DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Banzer v. . BanzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- In Re Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Act of the Estate of CookseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- In re the Accounting of MorganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- In Re the Estate of RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- In re the Final Accounting of Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962