Legal Opinion

Water & Energy Systems Technology, Inc. v. Keil

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1999No. 980250PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:

¶ 1 We granted appellant Steven Keil’s petition for an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiff Water & Energy Systems Technology, Inc. (“WEST”).

¶ 2 For approximately twelve years prior to March 2, 1998, Keil worked for WEST as a water treatment chemical salesman. Keil voluntarily terminated his employment with WEST on March 2, 1998, and accepted a similar sales position with one of WEST’s competitors, Brody Chemical (“Brody”). Keil did not have an employment contract with WEST nor did he sign a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Microbiological Research Corp. v. MunaUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Kasco Services Corp. v. BensonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Schwalm Electronics, Inc. v. Electrical Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. USA POWER, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. CDC Restoration & Construction, LC v. Tradesmen Contractors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. Storagecraft Technology Corp. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Utah Medical Products, Inc. v. Clinical Innovations Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1999
  5. Powercorp Alaska, LLC v. Alaska Energy AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API