Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided May 1, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representatives Mass

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:

1. Must county highway funds distributed pursuant to 69 O.S.1991, § 1503[69-1503], to the county commissioners of a particularcounty for the construction and maintenance of county roads beshared equally by all commissioners, acting as a board for theentire county and its roads and bridges? 2. Upon what basis are the funds sent by the State to a countyto be divided among the three commissioner districts of acounty? 3. Does machinery and equipment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Hartshorne v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Cavin v. Board of Com'rs of Garfield CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API