Opinion No. (1996)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Representatives Mass
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:
1. Must county highway funds distributed pursuant to 69 O.S.1991, § 1503[69-1503], to the county commissioners of a particularcounty for the construction and maintenance of county roads beshared equally by all commissioners, acting as a board for theentire county and its roads and bridges? 2. Upon what basis are the funds sent by the State to a countyto be divided among the three commissioner districts of acounty? 3. Does machinery and equipment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bank of Hartshorne v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Cavin v. Board of Com'rs of Garfield CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934