Legal Opinion

Ostrander v. Spickard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1846PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Petition for dower. Petition denied. The application was filed by Matilda Spickard at the September term, 1842, of the Warren Circuit Court. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner intermarried with George G. Ostrander, who, by suggestion pursuant to the statute, was made a party. Commissioners were appointed who made an assignment of dower. On the coining in of their report, the heirs of John Spickard, whose widow the petitioner was, appeared, and being minors, a guardian' ad litem was appointed on their behalf. The guardian answered, setting up a defence. The remaining facts…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Noel v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Kenworthy v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Shipman v. KeysIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Johnson v. RockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API