Wilcox v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Three separate notices to show cause why he should not be disciplined for alleged professional misconduct, based upon four specific charges, were issued and served upon the petitioner by the local administrative committee number two, returnable before the local administrative committee number nine, The State Bar of California, for hearing and decision, from which it concluded that petitioner’s acts as disclosed at said hearings involved moral turpitude and dishonesty on his part- within the meaning of subdivision 5, section 287, Code of Civil Procedure, and thereupon recommended, on April 30,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Herron v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re StepsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Cane v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Glenn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Fullove v. FulloveDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.