Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hansen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1912No. 2164PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by John A. -Hansen, guardian of Harry Saunders, a minor, against R. S. Steele and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This was an action brought by John A. Hansen, as guardian of Harry Saunders, a minor, against R. S. Steele, former guardian of the same minor, and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, surety upon his bond as such guardian. Steele was ordered by the county court to pay over certain moneys in his hands at the end of his guardianship, and he has failed and refused to do so. Some or all of the moneys in his hands were the proceeds of the sale of lands belonging to a minor Otoe Indian.

This case is controlled by the decision, United States IEdelity & Guaranty Co.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. WhitlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Showalter v. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API