Legal Opinion
Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 1, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
Tri-State Asphalt Corporation (TriState) petitions for review of the October 7, 2004, order of the Board of Claims (Board), which granted the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) motions for entry of judgment non pros and discovery sanctions against Tri-State, cancelled a scheduled pre-trial conference and hearing, and dismissed Tri-State’s complaint against DOT with prejudice. We vacate and remand.
On October 29, 1990, Tri-State filed a complaint against DOT with the Board, alleging multiple breaches of a construction contract to resurface Route 51 in Pittsburgh.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Public School Bldg. Auth. v. QuandelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- County of Erie v. Peerless Heater Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Jetson Direct Mail Services, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industry, State Workmen's Insurance FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fejerdy v. FejerdySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. Pennsylvania Industries for the Blind & HandicappedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Barr Street Corp. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- A. Khamphouseane & S. Khamphouseane v. S. ThorntonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- A. Khamphouseane & S. Khamphouseane v. S. ThorntonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. of PA by A.G. J. Shapiro v. Vision Property Mgmt., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023