Banks v. Lane
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceBbowN, J.
Wben this case was first before us, I, with the other members of the Court, was under the impression that service of the summons in the drainage proceedings was made on the mortgagor Pate, and that he owned the land subject-to the mortgage to Mrs. Banks at the time the drainage proceeding was commenced. Upon further investigation, it appears that when that proceeding was commenced, Mrs. Banks had not sold the land, and that the relation of mortgagor and mortgagee did not then exist between her and Pate. It appears now by the judge’s findings that no service of the summons was ever made on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foard v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Bowman v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910