Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Capper

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. B. F. Milam.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

Appellant was held liable to appellee for the value of several broken pieces of painted china shipped from Detroit, Michigan, to Fort Worth, Texas. The evidence tended to prove that the china was in good condition, properly packed in a barrel or hogshead, when it was received by the initial carrier, and that the barrel was in good condition when delivered to appellee at Fort Worth, but when it was opened several valuable pieces of the china were found to have been broken and ruined. The McVeigh Transfer Company delivered the barrel of china to appellee at her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Shriver v. Sioux City & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. North East Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. M. Lewis & Sons v. Illinois Cent. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Martin v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. FoetcheCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API