Kneisel v. Ursus Motor Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley
court.
By this writ of error Harry J. Myerson seeks to reverse an order of the circuit court of Cook county, entered May 13, 1924, dismissing for want of prosecution his intervening petition, filed on March 11, 1924, in the pending chancery cause of Kneisel et al. v. Ursus Motor Company et al. (hereinafter referred to as the Ursus case).
The bill in the Ursus case, filed March 2, 1922, by certain minority stockholders of the Ursus Motor Company, prayed for an accounting and other relief. Myerson was one of the solicitors filing the bill, and on the day of its filing Jacob Goldman was appointed1…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Squire v. . OrdemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- King v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- French v. FrenchIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Jackson v. SackettIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Becklenberg v. BecklenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hallam v. Alpha Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1940