Handy v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
After the trial court denied Melissa Sue Handy’s motion to suppress the results of her urine test, she agreed to a bench trial on stipulated facts. The trial court found her guilty of possession of methamphetamine and sentenced her as a first offender to four years on probation. On appeal from her conviction, Handy contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress because her consent to the drug test was coerced. As the trial court concluded otherwise based on findings of fact that are supported by the evidence, we disagree with Handy and affirm the trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Silva v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Silverio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010