Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Hoagland

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. S. D. Puterbaugh, Judge, presiding. This case was before the court, at the January term, 1868, when the decree of the court below was reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. It is reported in 46 Ill. 359, where the facts will be found sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. S. D. Puterbaugh, Judge, presiding. This case was before the court, at the January term, 1868, when the decree of the court below was reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. It is reported in 46 Ill. 359, where the facts will be found sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court. Upon a re-trial in the court below, additional evidence was introduced, in reference to the question whether the assignment of the judgment and certificate of purchase by Joseph C. Hoagland to Andrew Hoagland was fraudulent. A final…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This case was before this court at a previous term, and is reported in 46 Ill. 359. It was then held, that the judgment against Joshua J. Moore, was valid and binding on him, and as his land had been sold under it, an innocent purchaser or an assignee for a valuable consideration from the purchaser, could not be compelled to surrender the land because the judgment, in equity, might have belonged to other parties; that if the eestuis que trust permitted a person wrongfully to obtain a judgment in his name, when it should have been in theirs, they have no right to require an innocent person to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mansfield v. HoaglandIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Painter v. Merchants & Manufacturers BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API