Legal Opinion

People v. Brintley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1978No. Docket 77-2756, 77-3404PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., P. J.

Defendants were charged in a complaint and warrant with two counts: armed robbery contrary to MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2). Following a trial by the court, without a jury, the trial judge made findings of fact and conclusions of law among which are the following:

"I find, as a fact, beyond a reasonable doubt, that both defendants are guilty of Count I, robbery armed. I find, as a fact, that the instrumentality used in the robbery armed was a gun and that the defendant, Curtis…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. People v. Ora JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. HoganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. McGoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API