Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Tanksley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1961No. 39177PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

“The duties of a grand jury shall be confined to such matters and things as by the law they are required to perform.” Code § 59-301.

While it is the duty of the grand jury to investigate and present public officials for malpractice in the performance of their official duties (Groves v. State, 73 Ga. 205; Cook v. Sikes, 210 Ga. 722, 82 SE2d 641), a grand jury has no right in the absence of specific statutory authority to file a report charging or casting reflections of misconduct in office upon a public officer or impugning his character, except by presentment or true bill of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Brautigam v. Interim Report of Grand JurySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Groves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Macon-Bibb County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. In re HensleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Lowndes County v. DasherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Almand v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. In re July-August, 2003 Dekalb County Grand JuryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API