Legal Opinion
William T. Brady James Cardwell Dar-Kel Corporation v. Chester P. Brown Maria De Los Angeles Castelazo De Brown Lorna Brown De Mena
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1995No. 94-56639Published
1Opinion of the Court
60 F.3d 832
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
William T. BRADY; James Cardwell; Dar-Kel Corporation,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Chester P. BROWN; Maria De Los Angeles Castelazo De Brown;
Lorna Brown De Mena, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 94-56639.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided June 30, 1995.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Viken YacoubianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Nutri-Cology, Inc., D/B/A Allergy Research Group Biocurrents, Inc. Stephen A. Levine Susan D. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Smith v. RicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Hook v. State of Arizona, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.