Legal Opinion
Goods v. Bakersfield Police Department
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 20, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00663Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES FRANCIS GOODS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0663-DAD- JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT 13 v. ) PREJUDICE ) 14 BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPT., et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 17 Charles Francis Goods asserts the Bakersfield Police Department and an unidentified police 18 officer are liable for a violation of the First Amendment and a “threat to safety.” (Doc. 1) Because 19 Plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient for the Court to find he states a cognizable claim…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.