Carmody v. City of St. Paul

It seems to me that the court misconstrued the provisions of L. 1921, c. 82, § 19, in Lading v. City of Duluth, 153 Minn. 464, 190 N. W. 981, when it held § 19 thereof to vest in an injured employe the right to select a physician of his own choice. That section required an employer to furnish such medical, hospital, and other expenses specified as might reasonably be required, Avithin limits as to time and amount provided in the act, to cure and relieve an injured employe from the effects of an injury. Then follOAved the'provision which gave to the employe the right to petition the industrial…