Legal Opinion

Highway Dept. v. Stuckey's/DQ of Grand Bay

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1993No. 1911518PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Alabama Highway Department and its director appeal from a judgment declaring that a billboard belonging to the plaintiff, Stuckey's/DQ of Grand Bay, Inc. ("Stuckey's"), does not violate the provisions of the Highway Beautification Act — Outdoor Advertising, Alabama Code 1975, §§ 23-1-270 through -288.1 We affirm.

In 1965, Congress enacted the Federal Highway Beautification Act, 23 U.S.C. § 131, requiring states to either enact laws regulating highway advertising or face reduction of federal highway funding. Federal regulations under the Act permitted maintenance and continuance or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. McCrary v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Gannett Outdoor of Chicago v. BaiseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Advertising Co. v. Bradshaw, SEC. of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Home Ins. Co. v. Hillview 78 West Fire Dist.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. RIVER CONSERV. CO. v. Gulf States Paper Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Padgett v. CONECUH COUNTY COM'NSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Davis v. RussellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. City of Dothan v. Eighty-Four West, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Concerned Citizens v. City of FairfieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API