Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mathews v. Murray

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1953No. 3752PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

On Motion to Steike Supplemental • Affidavit, Etc.

2Per curiam

Original complaint in the nature of quo warranto. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss which was argued and submitted to this court May 25, 1953, subject to the filing of further briefs. Thereafter defendant, in support of his motion to dismiss upon the ground that the matter had become moot, filed a photostat copy of a purported resignation as state senator, to the governor. This was in response to plaintiff’s argument that the asserted resignation made to the county commissioners was not a resignation under our statutes. Defendant also…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People ex rel. Throop v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. State ex rel. Kendall v. ColeNevada Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. GlennSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. PageMontana Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Secretary of State v. STATE LEGISLATURENevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. University & Community College System of Nevada v. DR PartnersNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mullen v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Eads v. City of Boulder CityNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. NEV. POLICY RESEARCH INST. v. MILLERNevada Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API