Legal Opinion

Van Schaick v. Goodwyn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1935No. 3 Div. 133PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This appeal is prosecuted by George S. Van Schaick, as superintendent of insurance of New York, liquidating the Southern Surety Company, who was not a party to the suit when the final decree was rendered confirming the register’s report and decreeing the distribution of the funds brought into custodia legis through the appointment of Goodwyn as receiver.

Subsequent to the rendition of said final decree, the appellant was allowed to file a petition for rehearing under Rule 81 of Chancery Practice, and which appellee moved to strike. The application for rehearing was denied, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fancher Bros. & Co. v. Bibb Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. O'Rear v. O'RearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Cox v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Gibson v. Farmers' Bank of LuverneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Howard v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Williams v. WickerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Williams v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Linn v. LinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. West v. State Ex Rel. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Maya Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API