Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2018No. 157925Published

1Dissent

Markman, C.J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the majority's affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The majority concludes that the proposal at issue, i.e., the Voters Not Politicians (VNP) proposal, is eligible for placement on the November 2018 election ballot by the initiative process of Const 1963, art 12, § 2. I dissent because I conclude that the proposal constitutes a "general revision" of the Constitution and thus is eligible for placement on the ballot only by the convention process of Const 1963, art 12, § 3.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case, I would emphasize, does not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. People v. NuttMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API