Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State
Michigan Supreme Court
1Dissent
Markman, C.J. (dissenting).
I respectfully dissent from the majority's affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The majority concludes that the proposal at issue, i.e., the Voters Not Politicians (VNP) proposal, is eligible for placement on the November 2018 election ballot by the initiative process of Const 1963, art 12, § 2. I dissent because I conclude that the proposal constitutes a "general revision" of the Constitution and thus is eligible for placement on the ballot only by the convention process of Const 1963, art 12, § 3.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case, I would emphasize, does not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. NuttMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.