Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Carioscia v. Meisner
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 10, 1971No. 71 C 906, 71 C 950, 71 C 1495PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
Petitioners, Franklin Carioscia, Fred Coduto, and Louis Guido, all in the custody of the United States Marshal pursuant to revocation of their mandatory releases by the United States Board of Parole, have applied for writs of habeas corpus pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, Sec. 2241 et seq. The central question presented by each of the petitions is whether the petitioners were deprived of their liberty without due process of law because of the limited scope of the hearing provided to them by the United States Board of Parole prior to revocation of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DeVyver v. Warden, US PenitentiaryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- James Harvey Bradley, Jr. A/K/A Junior Bradley v. Emmett Fairfax, U.S. Marshal, Richard T. Mulcrone, U.S. Parole CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Standlee v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- LaMagna v. United States Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Lewis v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.