Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Rigsby

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1925No. 2473PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

Mansfield and Barnett, and F. E% Rigsby, appellee, in July, 1921, bought the oil and gas lease on block 1, Wig-ham Addition to the' town of Burkburnett. There had theretofore been drilled on said lease two wells. These wells were not producing at the date of the purchase, and had been dormant for some time. Mansfield and Barnett owned an undivided one-half interest in the lease, and Rigsby owned the other one-half. An engine was needed for the purpose of cleaning the wells out to thereafter obtain the production from said wells.- On July 26, 1920, said parties entered into a written contract,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nowlin v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hodde v. Malone Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Saulsbury v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Co. v. TeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Southern Casualty Co. v. Welch Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Northern Texas Utilities Co. v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API