State v. Brooks
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Where defendant failed to proffer a "fair and just reason" for withdrawing his guilty plea, the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea. Where the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that defendant did not render substantial assistance to the State pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(h)(5), we affirm the order and judgments of the trial court.
On three separate occasions in October and December of 2014, defendant Marcus Anthony Brooks sold varying amounts of heroin to a confidential informant ("CI") working for Detective…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PimentalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HandySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. MarshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ElderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. ElderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021