Legal Opinion

Emery v. Hussey Seating Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 21, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Defendants, Hussey Seating Co. and Hussey Seating Canada, Ltd. (Hussey), appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in the Superior Court (York County, Crowley, J.) in favor of plaintiffs, Chris and Donna Emery, and in favor of defendant Linamar Corporation. The jury found Hus-sey liable to plaintiffs for breach of warranty and absolved Linamar of any liability. Hus-sey contends that the court erred by failing to instruct the jury with respect to Linamar’s common law duty to indemnify. Hussey also argues that the court erred by instructing the jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arthur Araujo v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket Steamship Authority v. New England Telephone Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. East Penn Manufacturing Co. v. PinedaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Roberts v. American Chain & Cable Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Ames v. Dipietro-Kay Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mixer v. Tarratine MarketSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Sandler v. CalcagniDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
  3. Vescom Corp. v. American Heartland Health Administrators, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
  4. Eastern Maine Medical Center v. Walgreen Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  5. COFFIN v. AMETEK INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API