Smith v. Mark Chrisman Trucking
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 826 285 NEBRASKA REPORTS not within the exception. A herd of elephants cannot be fairly characterized as a herd of zebras simply because one zebra is traveling with the elephants. By treating multi-purpose PTO as defined in the PayFlex policy as the equivalent of vacation leave simply because vacation is one of the purposes for which it can be used, the majority’s reasoning permits the exception to swallow the rule. Because I would hold that PayFlex’s PTO is not vaca- tion leave within the meaning of § 48-1229(4), I would find that the employees were not entitled to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Proctor v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Young v. Dodge County Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Kratochvil v. Motor Club Ins. Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- No Frills Supermarket, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Jeffers v. Pappas Trucking, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Potter v. McCullaNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Deleon v. Reinke Mfg. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Dragon v. Cheesecake FactoryNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Gonzalez v. State (In Re Carlos D.)Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Guardianship of Carlos D.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.