Legal Opinion

Cramer v. Perine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The law of this case as to locating the dividing line between the properties of plaintiff and defendants in the accreted lands involved is laid down in Cramer v. Perine (197 App. Div. 218). The determination in that case required the location of the Cazenovia creek as it existed in 1904, when John L. Dow, the predecessor in title of both parties to this action, held title to all the premises involved. Credible testimony was presented at the trial with reference to the title from which such location should have been made as about to be indicated. The interlocutory judgment appealed from is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cramer v. PerineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ludington v. MarsdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API