Legal Opinion

Jones v. Gould

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1907Published

Application for leave to serve a supplemental answer.

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

This is an application for leave to serve a supplemental answer. The answer which it is desired ,to *329serve alleges that since the institution of the above entitled action a judgment has been entered in this court in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants in another action instituted in this court subsequently to the above entitled action between the same parties and upon the same alleged transaction and praying for the same relief, which said judgment stands unreversed and unmodified and is a bar to this action and to the prosecution thereof. While it is true, as was held in Ratzer v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Groshon v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Hoyt v. SheldonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
  3. Morel v. GarellyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1863
  4. Ratzer v. RatzerNew York Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Barrowcliffe v. CumminsNew York Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API