Legal Opinion

Lindner v. Szuster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Action for trespass upon farm lands. Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint as insufficient in law, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with leave to defendant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is in possession of the Randall farm by virtue of a lease *731from the owner thereof It gves the description of that farm by metes and bounds. There is an allegation that defendant trespassed upon “ that portion of the said farm known as the orchard.”…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Binghamton v. T & K Communications Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API