Legal Opinion

Motor Truck Supply Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1965No. 4-63-Civ-381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

This is an action to enjoin, annul and set aside the Report and Order of the Interstate Commerce Commission of January 31, 1963 in its Docket MC-C-3193, Schirmer Transp. Co., Inc., — Investigation, 91 M.C.C. 869, which found that the plaintiffs had been engaged in unauthorized interstate motor carrier operations, participated in by the intervening plaintiff, and ordered them to cease and desist therefrom.

The pertinent statutes are 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284, 2321-2325, 49 U.S. C.A. § 305(g) and 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009. Jurisdiction is established.

The issue is whether the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
  4. Schultz Transit, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beschnett v. Farmers Equitable Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Soo Line Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
  3. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
  4. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
  5. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API