Legal Opinion · Dissent

Erwin v. Tweed

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 2003No. COA02-1243Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

The majority’s opinion reverses summary judgment and remands to the trial court for a second time to determine the same facts required by this Court upon remand of the first appeal. No genuine issue of material fact exists. Plaintiff failed to offer any evidence of an essential element of his claim: that his truck’s “gross vehicle weight as specified by the manufacturer” is less than 10,000 pounds. I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the trial court’s decision.

Plaintiff bears the burden of making a claim under the policy and the statute. Plaintiff was required by the statute and the prior…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Erwin v. TweedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API