Legal Opinion
Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 9, 2006No. 05-158-P-DMCPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE 1
DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have filed fifteen motions in limine in this action arising out of a workplace accident involving a lift truck manufactured by the defendant. I will first address the four motions filed by the defendant.
I. Defendant’s Motions
A. Post-Sale Actions by Defendant
The defendant moves “to prohibit the introduction of evidence about design features of lift trucks, product up-grades and product informational bulletins developed after the initial sale of the subject lift truck but before the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Dion LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- John E. RYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLACK & DECKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Werner v. LaneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leon v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.