Legal Opinion
Citizens for Better v. US Dept. of Agriculture
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 17, 2007No. C01-00728 MJJPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR BE NOVO REVIEW OF OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE’S JULY 24, 2006, AND NOVEMBER 3, 2006 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
JENKINS, District Judge.
Before the Court is Federal Defendants’ timely filed Motion for De Novo Review of Objections to Magistrate Chen’s July 24, 2006 and November 3, 2006 Report and Recommendation for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. (Doc. Nos. 142 and 153) Plaintiffs responded to the Defendants objections.
The Court has read and considered Defendants’ objections, reviewed the memo-randa submitted by the parties and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Citizens for Better Forestry v. UsdaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009