Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Mejia v. Drake Group, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 2014Published

1DissentGarry, J.

I respectfully dissent. The uninsured employer alleged that there was no employment relationship with claimant, but refused to offer evidentiary proof to support this allegation and, thereafter, failed to exercise the right to seek review by the Workers’ Compensation Board pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 23. As a result, this Court has a strictly limited power of review in this matter. Considering the circumstances, I find the denial of the employer’s application to rehear or reopen this claim “in the interest of justice” entirely proper and rational (12 NYCRR 300.14 [a] [3]), and I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burris v. OlcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Claim of Emanatian v. Saratoga Springs Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Claim of Harris v. Phoenix Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Claim of Taylor v. Raleigh HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API