Honan v. Voog, No. 30 37 80 (Oct. 28, 1994)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 150 On November 29, 1993, the plaintiffs, Daniel Honan, Edith Honan,1 and Bradley Honan, filed a six count second amended complaint wherein they seek damages from the defendant, Attorney Norman Voog.

The plaintiffs allege that the defendant is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Connecticut.2

The first count alleges that, without privilege to do so, the defendant engaged in conduct by which he intentionally inflicted emotional distress. Counts…